UScode15paragraph78u1
UScode15paragraph78u1 is article from the USA penal code.
UScode15paragraph78u1 refers to the insider trading.
It is specific king of fraud when one knows about plans of governor to make certain actions that affect the stock prices and use this insider information as forecast for prices.
The insider trading may include the strange decisions of officials that
look stupid, idiotic, but have goal to affect prices at the stock market
in favor of accomplices of a corrupted Offee. Such a favor seems to be a part of the election fraud and the important channel of a collapse of an empire with total corruption, id est a mechanism of history.
The insider trading easy combines with the TrumpyDumpy practice described in article «UScode15paragraph78u1» of the same code.
Since year 2025, the UScode15paragraph78u1 becomes especially important for the analysis and interpretation of historic events due to activity of Donald Trump; see «Donroe Doctrine», «Newspeak», «Rule of Newspeak», «Trade war», «TrumpForever».
In order to simplify the search and the referencing, the text of UScode15paragraph78u1 in its state for year 2025 is copipasted below; site of the Cornell University https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/78u-1 [1] is used as source.
Original for year 2025
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/78u-1
15 U.S. Code § 78u-1 - Civil penalties for insider trading
(a) Authority to impose civil penalties
(1) Judicial actions by Commission authorized
Whenever it shall appear to the Commission that any person has violated any provision of this chapter or the rules or regulations thereunder by purchasing or selling a security or security-based swap agreement while in possession of material, nonpublic information in, or has violated any such provision by communicating such information in connection with, a transaction on or through the facilities of a national securities exchange or from or through a broker or dealer, and which is not part of a public offering by an issuer of securities other than standardized options or security futures products, the Commission—
(A) may bring an action in a United States district court to seek, and the court shall have jurisdiction to impose, a civil penalty to be paid by the person who committed such violation; and
(B) may, subject to subsection (b)
(1), bring an action in a United States district court to seek, and the court shall have jurisdiction to impose, a civil penalty to be paid by a person who, at the time of the violation, directly or indirectly controlled the person who committed such violation.
(2) Amount of penalty for person who committed violation
The amount of the penalty which may be imposed on the person who committed such violation shall be determined by the court in light of the facts and circumstances, but shall not exceed three times the profit gained or loss avoided as a result of such unlawful purchase, sale, or communication.
(3) Amount of penalty for controlling person
The amount of the penalty which may be imposed on any person who, at the time of the violation, directly or indirectly controlled the person who committed such violation, shall be determined by the court in light of the facts and circumstances, but shall not exceed the greater of $1,000,000, or three times the amount of the profit gained or loss avoided as a result of such controlled person’s violation. If such controlled person’s violation was a violation by communication, the profit gained or loss avoided as a result of the violation shall, for purposes of this paragraph only, be deemed to be limited to the profit gained or loss avoided by the person or persons to whom the controlled person directed such communication.
(b) Limitations on liability
(1) Liability of controlling persons
No controlling person shall be subject to a penalty under subsection (a)(1)(B) unless the Commission establishes that—
(A) such controlling person knew or recklessly disregarded the fact that such controlled person was likely to engage in the act or acts constituting the violation and failed to take appropriate steps to prevent such act or acts before they occurred; or
(B) such controlling person knowingly or recklessly failed to establish, maintain, or enforce any policy or procedure required under section 78o(f) [1] of this title or section 80b–4a of this title and such failure substantially contributed to or permitted the occurrence of the act or acts constituting the violation.
(2) Additional restrictions on liability
No person shall be subject to a penalty under subsection (a) solely by reason of employing another person who is subject to a penalty under such subsection, unless such employing person is liable as a controlling person under paragraph
(1) of this subsection. Section 78t(a) of this title shall not apply to actions under subsection (a) of this section.
(c) Authority of Commission
The Commission, by such rules, regulations, and orders as it considers necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors, may exempt, in whole or in part, either unconditionally or upon specific terms and conditions, any person or transaction or class of persons or transactions from this section.
(d) Procedures for collection
(1) Payment of penalty to Treasury
A penalty imposed under this section shall be payable into the Treasury of the United States, except as otherwise provided in section 7246 of this title and section 78u–6 of this title.
(2) Collection of penalties
If a person upon whom such a penalty is imposed shall fail to pay such penalty within the time prescribed in the court’s order, the Commission may refer the matter to the Attorney General who shall recover such penalty by action in the appropriate United States district court.
(3) Remedy not exclusive
The actions authorized by this section may be brought in addition to any other actions that the Commission or the Attorney General are entitled to bring.
(4) Jurisdiction and venue
For purposes of section 78aa of this title, actions under this section shall be actions to enforce a liability or a duty created by this chapter.
(5) Statute of limitations
No action may be brought under this section more than 5 years after the date of the purchase or sale. This section shall not be construed to bar or limit in any manner any action by the Commission or the Attorney General under any other provision of this chapter, nor shall it bar or limit in any manner any action to recover penalties, or to seek any other order regarding penalties, imposed in an action commenced within 5 years of such transaction.
(e) Definition
For purposes of this section, “profit gained” or “loss avoided” is the difference between the purchase or sale price of the security and the value of that security as measured by the trading price of the security a reasonable period after public dissemination of the nonpublic information.
(f) Limitation on Commission authority
The authority of the Commission under this section with respect to security-based swap agreements shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations of section 78c–1(b) of this title.
(g) Duty of Members and employees of Congress
(1) In general
Subject to the rule of construction under section 10 of the STOCK Act and solely for purposes of the insider trading prohibitions arising under this chapter, including section 78j(b) of this title and Rule 10b–5 thereunder, each Member of Congress or employee of Congress owes a duty arising from a relationship of trust and confidence to the Congress, the United States Government, and the citizens of the United States with respect to material, nonpublic information derived from such person’s position as a Member of Congress or employee of Congress or gained from the performance of such person’s official responsibilities.
(2) Definitions
In this subsection—
(A) the term “Member of Congress” means a member of the Senate or House of Representatives, a Delegate to the House of Representatives, and the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico; and
(B) the term “employee of Congress” means—
(i) any individual (other than a Member of Congress), whose compensation is disbursed by the Secretary of the Senate or the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives; and
(ii) any other officer or employee of the legislative branch (as defined in section 13101(11) of title 5).
(3) Rule of construction
Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to impair or limit the construction of the existing antifraud provisions of the securities laws or the authority of the Commission under those provisions.
(h) Duty of other Federal officials
(1) In general
Subject to the rule of construction under section 10 of the STOCK Act and solely for purposes of the insider trading prohibitions arising under this chapter, including section 78j(b) of this title, and Rule 10b–5 thereunder, each executive branch employee, each judicial officer, and each judicial employee owes a duty arising from a relationship of trust and confidence to the United States Government and the citizens of the United States with respect to material, nonpublic information derived from such person’s position as an executive branch employee, judicial officer, or judicial employee or gained from the performance of such person’s official responsibilities.
(2) Definitions
In this subsection—
(A) the term “executive branch employee”—
(i) has the meaning given the term “employee” under section 2105 of title 5;
(ii) includes—
(I) the President;
(II) the Vice President; and
(III) an employee of the United States Postal Service or the Postal Regulatory Commission;
(B) the term “judicial employee” has the meaning given that term in section 13101(9) of title 5; and
(C) the term “judicial officer” has the meaning given that term under section 13101(10) of title 5.
(3) Rule of construction
Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to impair or limit the construction of the existing antifraud provisions of the securities laws or the authority of the Commission under those provisions.
(i) Participation in initial public offerings
An individual described in section 13103(f) of title 5 may not purchase securities that are the subject of an initial public offering (within the meaning given such term in section 78l(f)(1)(G)(i) of this title) in any manner other than is available to members of the public generally.
(June 6, 1934, ch. 404, title I, § 21A, as added Pub. L. 100–704, § 3(a)(2), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4677; amended Pub. L. 101–429, title II, § 202(b), Oct. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 938; Pub. L. 106–554, § 1(a)(5) [title II, § 205(a)(4), title III, § 303(k), (l)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–426, 2763A–456, 2763A–457; Pub. L. 107–204, title III, § 308(d)(2), July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 785; Pub. L. 111–203, title VII, § 762(d)(7), title IX, § 923(b)(2), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1761, 1850; Pub. L. 112–105, §§ 4(b)(2), 9(b)(2)(B), 12, Apr. 4, 2012, 126 Stat. 292, 297, 300; Pub. L. 117–286, § 4(c)(24), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4357.)
Historic context
UScode15paragraph78u1 refers to the insider trading.
The insider trading may include the strange decisions of officials that
look stupid, idiotic, but have goal to affect prices at the stock market
in favor of accomplices of a corrupted Offee. Such a favor seems to be a part of the election fraud and the important channel of a collapse of an empire with total corruption, id est a mechanism of history.
The insider trading easy combines with the TrumpyDumpy practice described in article «UScode15paragraph78u1» of the same code.
At heavy corruption/usurpation, the investigation of cases described in articles
«UScode15paragraph78u1» and
«UScode18paragraph1348» becomes difficult if at al;
then, the combination of the insider trading with TrumpyDumpy may destroy, ruin the political system and economic of a country; see «Collapse of USA».
UScode15paragraph78u1 becomes important for interpretation of historical events due to the Trade war by Donald Trump. An alternative hypotheses assume that Donald Trump is Russian and/or Chinese spy (see «Trump as KGB agent») or that Trump is an useful idiot handled by the Russian dictator putin and/or his Chinese colleague Xi Jinping.
The permanent misinformation from side of Donald Trump and his Trade war, prohibiting tariffs indicates that he uses Newspeak instead fo English. The apparent goal of the this activity is destabilization of the world-wide market, to devastate the world-wide system of collective defense, to provoke and to escalate the Putin world war, to prolong it, in order to make the insider trading and TrumpyDumpy more efficient, to trump, to bring to bankruptcy those businesspersons who to not support him and therefore have no insider information from him.
The insider trading appears as a soft equivalent of elimination of all other parties typical for Moscovia at least since the USSR: there, the bolshetiks physically eliminated their main competitors mensheviks, establishing the totalitarism, fascism, total power of the single dictator.
No analogy is perfect; it will be interesting to see:
Will the Separation of powers be eliminated at the level of legislation of the USA?
In this case the model «Duration» applies; in this model, the Empire collapses in approximately 15 years since the elimination of the Separation powers.
Will the application of articles
UScode15paragraph78u1 and
UScode18paragraph1348
of the USA code stop the development of the corruption, block this channek of the collapse of the country?
In this case, the program of ppusurpation]] (see «TrumpForever») is expected to fail,
due to the appropriate application of the American Constitution and the corresponding articles of the American penal code.
Warning
The text of the UScode15paragraph78u1 is loaded for year 2025; this state seem to be most important for the historic analysis. It is not updated. For the updated information, please, use the original.
The text of UScode15paragraph78u1 is loaded at TORI with scientific goals. That may refer to elaboration of definitions for ambiguous terms, construction of historic models and the testing.
The analysis suggested is not an attempt to affect the Realpolitik of the American administration not activity of Americans who dislike this Realpolitik.
At least since year 2015, there seem to be no request for the truth in the society.
If Americans decide to convert the peaceful democratic USA to aggressive corrupted monarchy, to destroy the USA
[2][3][4],
then no scientific analysis can help them.
However, even in this case the Editor keeps his right (and even duty) to call things with their proper names,
to formulate definitions for euphemisms and other ambiguous terms,
to construct historic models and to compare their predictions to a posteriori observations.
References
- ↑ https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/78u-1 USA code (2025) // 15 U.S. Code § 78u-1 - Civil penalties for insider trading
- ↑ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjfgHZdZuVI Почему Америка должна спасать СЕБЯ Mark Solonin Jul 23, 2024
- ↑ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHYbhlHltRw Америка собралась самоубиться? Беседа с профессором Знаменским. Mark Solonin. Aug 21, 2024.
- ↑ https://theconversation.com/why-annexing-canada-would-destroy-the-united-states-249561 Why annexing Canada would destroy the United States Published: February 11, 2025 5.07pm GMT As United States President Donald Trump relentlessly threatens to annex Canada, some Canadians are worried that an American invasion could one day become a reality. // How would that scenario play out? Looking at the sheer size of the American military, many people might believe that Trump would enjoy an easy victory. // That analysis is wrong. If Trump ever decides to use military force to annex Canada, the result would not be determined by a conventional military confrontation between the Canadian and American armies. Rather, a military invasion of Canada would trigger a decades-long violent resistance, which would ultimately destroy the United States.
Keywords
«[[]]», «Andy Ogles», «Annexation of Canada», «Annexation of Greenland», «Annexation of Panama», «Collapse of USA», «Corruption», «Donald Trump», «Fraud», «Insider trading», «James David Vance», «Newspeak», «Pump and dump», «Realpolitik», «Rule of Newspeak», «Trade war», «Trump and Vance», «Trump as KGB agent», «TrumpForever», «TrumptyDumpty», «Trumpty Dumpty», «USA Criminal Code», «UScode18paragraph1348», «UScode15paragraph78u1» «UScode15paragraph78t» , «Usurpation»,
- Andy Ogles
- Annexation of Canada
- Annexation of Greenland
- Annexation of Panama
- Collapse of USA
- Corruption
- Donald Trump
- Fraud
- James David Vance
- Newspeak
- Pump and dump
- Realpolitik
- Rule of Newspeak
- Trade war
- Trump and Vance
- Trump as KGB agent
- TrumpForever
- TrumptyDumpty
- Trumpty Dumpty
- USA Criminal Code
- UScode18paragraph1348
- UScode15paragraph78u1
- Usurpation